home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0599>
- <title>
- Mar. 23, 1992: The Mysterious Stealth Ship
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Mar. 23, 1992 Clinton vs. Tsongas
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 34
- HIGH SEAS
- The Mysterious Stealth Ship
- </hdr><body>
- <p>How did a freighter reportedly loaded with Scud missiles bound
- for Syria manage to elude U.S. watchdogs?
- </p>
- <p>By Barbara Rudolph--Reported by Robert Slater/Jerusalem and
- Bruce van Voorst/Washington
- </p>
- <p> It seemed a straightforward assignment for the high-tech
- wizards in naval intelligence. They were alerted that the North
- Korean freighter Dae Hung Ho had sailed with a reputed cargo of
- Scud-C ballistic missiles bound ultimately for Syria, and they
- were told to track it. Last week an eager faction in the
- National Security Council and the State Department leaked word
- that the U.S. was determined to intercept the freighter and
- search its hold as it made its way from the Indian Ocean toward
- the Persian Gulf, where U.S. naval vessels were patrolling to
- enforce the U.N. embargo against Iraq. But after 10 days of less
- than crackerjack surveillance, the Dae Hung Ho eluded U.S.
- warships and docked peacefully in the Iranian port of Bandar
- Abbas. The Pentagon suddenly had a lot to explain.
- </p>
- <p> Central Command Marine General Joseph Hoar confessed to a
- congressional committee that the failure was a basic one. "We
- were unable to locate the ship, clear and simple," he said. "We
- made every effort, and we were unable to do it." But the real
- problem, Navy insiders grumbled, was bad judgment at the top.
- Said an officer: "Initially there was no high priority for this
- assignment. We were told to look for the ship, no more."
- Meanwhile the vessels and aircraft best equipped for spotting
- the freighter in the 800,000-sq.-mi. area, the aircraft carrier
- America battle group, were carrying out exercises hundreds of
- miles away.
- </p>
- <p> The Navy was apparently caught in the cross fire between
- officials back in Washington who wanted to "board now" to
- determine if there were any Scuds and those who argued that such
- a bold move would doom negotiations under way to bring about
- full international monitoring of North Korea's nuclear
- facilities. "On any scale, the Korean nukes are far more
- important than a few Scuds," said an Administration insider.
- Only in the final day or so before the Ho arrived in Iran did
- word reach the Navy that intercepting the freighter was a high
- priority.
- </p>
- <p> By then it was too late. Pentagon spokesman Pete Williams
- made an effort to minimize the embarrassment--to little
- avail. "There are a lot of arms sales going on in the world that
- we don't like," he told reporters, "but that doesn't mean we
- have the legal authority to stop them." Nonetheless, Williams
- said, the Navy made every effort to track the Dae Hung Ho. "It
- would have been nice to have found it," he added.
- </p>
- <p> Washington's embarrassment served as an excuse for Syrian
- President Hafez Assad to lash out at U.S. Middle East policies.
- Damascus already has Scud missiles capable of striking Israel.
- The Scud-Cs believed to be part of the Ho's cargo have a greater
- range, at more than 300 miles, than the Scud-Bs already in
- Syria's arsenal, but they would not significantly alter the
- balance of power in the Middle East. While denying that the Ho
- was delivering new missiles--a denial echoed by North Korea--Assad attacked Washington's efforts to "strip the Arabs of
- their weapons" while "allowing Israel to manufacture arms."
- </p>
- <p> Israel voiced no public reaction. Privately, however,
- officials are furious at American inability or unwillingness to
- thwart what they are firmly convinced was a deliberate mission
- to deliver the missiles to their archenemy. "What kind of
- garbage is this?" asked an Israeli government official. "The
- U.S. doesn't have the ability to stop a North Korean ship?
- Either it wants to or it doesn't."
- </p>
- <p> The Administration would like to avoid answering that
- question. Already reporters were asking what the U.S. intended
- to do about the Iran Salaam, an Iranian freighter suspected of
- transporting arms. Said spokesman Williams: "I don't think we
- plan to do anything further." That strategy, at least, is easy
- to execute.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-