home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
032392
/
0323001.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
4KB
|
96 lines
<text id=92TT0599>
<title>
Mar. 23, 1992: The Mysterious Stealth Ship
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Mar. 23, 1992 Clinton vs. Tsongas
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
WORLD, Page 34
HIGH SEAS
The Mysterious Stealth Ship
</hdr><body>
<p>How did a freighter reportedly loaded with Scud missiles bound
for Syria manage to elude U.S. watchdogs?
</p>
<p>By Barbara Rudolph--Reported by Robert Slater/Jerusalem and
Bruce van Voorst/Washington
</p>
<p> It seemed a straightforward assignment for the high-tech
wizards in naval intelligence. They were alerted that the North
Korean freighter Dae Hung Ho had sailed with a reputed cargo of
Scud-C ballistic missiles bound ultimately for Syria, and they
were told to track it. Last week an eager faction in the
National Security Council and the State Department leaked word
that the U.S. was determined to intercept the freighter and
search its hold as it made its way from the Indian Ocean toward
the Persian Gulf, where U.S. naval vessels were patrolling to
enforce the U.N. embargo against Iraq. But after 10 days of less
than crackerjack surveillance, the Dae Hung Ho eluded U.S.
warships and docked peacefully in the Iranian port of Bandar
Abbas. The Pentagon suddenly had a lot to explain.
</p>
<p> Central Command Marine General Joseph Hoar confessed to a
congressional committee that the failure was a basic one. "We
were unable to locate the ship, clear and simple," he said. "We
made every effort, and we were unable to do it." But the real
problem, Navy insiders grumbled, was bad judgment at the top.
Said an officer: "Initially there was no high priority for this
assignment. We were told to look for the ship, no more."
Meanwhile the vessels and aircraft best equipped for spotting
the freighter in the 800,000-sq.-mi. area, the aircraft carrier
America battle group, were carrying out exercises hundreds of
miles away.
</p>
<p> The Navy was apparently caught in the cross fire between
officials back in Washington who wanted to "board now" to
determine if there were any Scuds and those who argued that such
a bold move would doom negotiations under way to bring about
full international monitoring of North Korea's nuclear
facilities. "On any scale, the Korean nukes are far more
important than a few Scuds," said an Administration insider.
Only in the final day or so before the Ho arrived in Iran did
word reach the Navy that intercepting the freighter was a high
priority.
</p>
<p> By then it was too late. Pentagon spokesman Pete Williams
made an effort to minimize the embarrassment--to little
avail. "There are a lot of arms sales going on in the world that
we don't like," he told reporters, "but that doesn't mean we
have the legal authority to stop them." Nonetheless, Williams
said, the Navy made every effort to track the Dae Hung Ho. "It
would have been nice to have found it," he added.
</p>
<p> Washington's embarrassment served as an excuse for Syrian
President Hafez Assad to lash out at U.S. Middle East policies.
Damascus already has Scud missiles capable of striking Israel.
The Scud-Cs believed to be part of the Ho's cargo have a greater
range, at more than 300 miles, than the Scud-Bs already in
Syria's arsenal, but they would not significantly alter the
balance of power in the Middle East. While denying that the Ho
was delivering new missiles--a denial echoed by North Korea--Assad attacked Washington's efforts to "strip the Arabs of
their weapons" while "allowing Israel to manufacture arms."
</p>
<p> Israel voiced no public reaction. Privately, however,
officials are furious at American inability or unwillingness to
thwart what they are firmly convinced was a deliberate mission
to deliver the missiles to their archenemy. "What kind of
garbage is this?" asked an Israeli government official. "The
U.S. doesn't have the ability to stop a North Korean ship?
Either it wants to or it doesn't."
</p>
<p> The Administration would like to avoid answering that
question. Already reporters were asking what the U.S. intended
to do about the Iran Salaam, an Iranian freighter suspected of
transporting arms. Said spokesman Williams: "I don't think we
plan to do anything further." That strategy, at least, is easy
to execute.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>